Research Excellence Award
Hélène Jeltsch-David
Centre National de la recherche Scientifique, France
| Hélène Jeltsch-David | |
|---|---|
| Affiliation | Centre National de la recherche Scientifique |
| Country | France |
| Scholar ID | 6701599661 |
| Documents | 57 |
| Citations | 4,697 |
| h-index | 28 |
| Subject Area | Neuroimmunology |
| Event | International Academic Achievements & Awards |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3630-7242 |
Helene jesltsch david and the advancement of a defined academic field. This recognition profile presents Hélène Jeltsch-David in relation to her stated affiliation with the Centre National de la recherche Scientifique in France and her research subject area of neuroimmunology. The bibliometric figures presented in this article are supplied profile information and may change as bibliographic databases are updated.
Abstract
Hélène Jeltsch-David is presented for consideration under the Research Excellence Award in recognition of a research profile associated with neuroimmunology and an institutional affiliation with the Centre National de la recherche Scientifique in France. The supplied bibliometric profile records 57 documents, 4,697 citations, and an h-index of 28. These indicators provide quantitative context for the visibility and citation history of the research record, while bibliometric measures alone do not constitute a complete assessment of scientific quality, methodological rigor, originality, or societal significance.[1][2]
Keywords
Research Excellence Award; Hélène Jeltsch-David; neuroimmunology; immunology; neuroscience; scientific research; biomedical research; Centre National de la recherche Scientifique; research impact; bibliometrics.
Introduction
Neuroimmunology examines interactions between the nervous and immune systems and encompasses mechanisms relevant to neurological health, inflammation, immune regulation, and disease. Contemporary research in this area frequently combines cellular and molecular biology with neuroscience, immunology, genetics, and translational approaches. The field is particularly relevant to understanding how immune responses can influence neural function and how neurological conditions can involve complex immune mechanisms.[3][4]
Within this broader scientific context, a research-excellence assessment may consider the coherence of a research programme, the originality and rigor of published work, scholarly dissemination, collaboration, and evidence that research has contributed to knowledge in the relevant field. Bibliometric information can provide supporting quantitative evidence, but it is appropriately interpreted alongside qualitative indicators of research contribution.[1][2]
Research Profile
The supplied profile identifies Hélène Jeltsch-David with the Centre National de la recherche Scientifique in France and places her research subject area within neuroimmunology. Her listed Scopus author identifier is 6701599661. The supplied profile reports 57 documents, 4,697 citations, and an h-index of 28. Such indicators are database-dependent and should be regarded as a snapshot rather than a permanent measurement of a researcher’s scholarly record.
- Research field: Neuroimmunology.
- Institutional affiliation: Centre National de la recherche Scientifique, France.
- Scopus author identifier: 6701599661.
- Documents reported in the supplied profile: 57.
- Citations reported in the supplied profile: 4,697.
- h-index reported in the supplied profile: 28.
Research Contributions
The supplied research classification places the profile within neuroimmunology. Research in this discipline addresses the biological relationship between immune activity and nervous-system processes, including communication between immune and neural cells, inflammatory mechanisms, and the role of immune regulation in neurological conditions.[3][4] A complete assessment of individual contributions requires examination of the researcher’s publications, experimental or analytical methods, authorship contributions, and the specific findings reported in the primary literature.
The reported bibliometric record provides one quantitative dimension of scholarly dissemination. Citation counts can help identify how frequently published work has been referenced by subsequent research, while the h-index combines publication and citation information into a single indicator. Both measures have recognized limitations, including differences between fields, publication practices, database coverage, and citation accumulation over time.[1][2]
Publications
The supplied information reports 57 documents associated with the researcher profile. Because individual publication titles, publication years, journal details, and article-level identifiers were not provided in the source information for this page, specific publications are not listed here to avoid attributing works without sufficient verification.
- Scopus author record: Author ID 6701599661.
- Reported document count: 57.
- Reported citation count: 4,697.
- Reported h-index: 28.
Research Impact
Research impact can be considered through multiple dimensions, including influence on subsequent scholarship, development of scientific knowledge, collaboration, translation of findings, education, and wider societal or clinical relevance. Citation indicators provide evidence of scholarly uptake but should not be interpreted in isolation as measures of research quality or practical impact.[1][2]
For the supplied profile, the reported 4,697 citations and h-index of 28 indicate a substantial citation record within the indexed database used for the profile. The figures are presented descriptively and may vary over time as publications are indexed, records are corrected, and citations accumulate.
Award Suitability
The supplied profile contains several elements commonly considered in an academic recognition review: an identified research field, an established institutional affiliation, a documented scholarly profile, and reported bibliometric indicators. The reported record of 57 documents, 4,697 citations, and an h-index of 28 can therefore serve as quantitative supporting information in an award-review process.
A complete award assessment should additionally examine the substantive content and originality of the research, methodological quality, documented contribution to the field, authorship and collaboration context, publication venues, and evidence of research influence. These qualitative dimensions are important because citation metrics alone cannot establish the significance or quality of an individual contribution.[1][2]
Conclusion
Hélène Jeltsch-David is presented in this recognition profile as a researcher affiliated with the Centre National de la recherche Scientifique in France and working within the subject area of neuroimmunology. The supplied bibliometric information records 57 documents, 4,697 citations, and an h-index of 28. These data provide a quantitative description of the indexed research profile, while a comprehensive academic recognition decision should incorporate direct evaluation of publications and substantive research contributions.
External Links
- Scopus Author Profile: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=6701599661
- Scopus–ORCID Association: Author ID 57205726637 / ORCID association
- ORCID Profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-7242
- Award Website: https://academicachievements.org
References
- Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
- Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20609
- Ransohoff, R. M., & Brown, M. A. (2012). Innate immunity in the central nervous system. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 122(4), 1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI58644
- Ransohoff, R. M. (2016). How neuroinflammation contributes to neurodegeneration. Science, 353(6301), 777–783. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2590
Bibliometric figures in this article are based on the supplied profile information and are subject to change as scholarly databases are updated. External links and identifiers should be independently checked before use for formal verification.